Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2007-November/075364.html below:

[Python-Dev] Should we do away with unbound methods in Py3k?

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Should we do away with unbound methods in Py3k?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Should we do away with unbound methods in Py3k?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

"Guido van Rossum" <guido at python.org> wrote in message 
news:ca471dc20711240956l28254408v51f404e181ab064a at mail.gmail.com...
| Also, there was discussion of this before:
| http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-January/050625.html
| -- why didn't we decide to do it then?

1. Nobody ran with it.
2. There was mild concern with breaking 2.x code. 

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Should we do away with unbound methods in Py3k?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Should we do away with unbound methods in Py3k?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4