>On Nov 12, 2007, at 8:16 AM, M.-A. Lemburg wrote: >> We have a -1 from Martin and a +1 from Walter, Guido and myself. >> Pretty clear vote if you ask me. I'd say we end the discussion here >> and move on. > >If we're counting, you've got a -1 on the codec from me as well. >Martin's right: there's no value to embedding the logic of auto- >detection into the codec. A function somewhere in the xml package is >all that's warranted. I agree with Fred here - it should be a function in the xml package, not a codec. -1 -- Andrew McNamara, Senior Developer, Object Craft http://www.object-craft.com.au/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4