> Not really, but the codec has more control over what happens to > the stream, ie. it's easier to implement look-ahead in the codec > than to do the detection and then try to push the bytes back onto > the stream (which may or may not be possible depending on the > nature of the stream). YAGNI. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4