On Thu, Nov 01, 2007, Greg Ewing wrote: > > But there's something that bothers me about the whole propery > mechanism -- there's no straightforward way for a property accessor to > call the inherited version from a base class. > > Wrapping property accessors up in decorators makes this worse. At > least when the accessors are declared as separate functions you have > a chance of grabbing an inherited one and calling it. But if they're > buried inside property descriptors with no other reference to them, > it's a lot harder to get hold of one. That's why the property delegates to a normal method. (Kudos to Martelli for the idea.) -- Aahz (aahz at pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/ "Typing is cheap. Thinking is expensive." --Roy Smith
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4