Hoi, Dennis Benzinger <Dennis.Benzinger <at> gmx.net> writes: > Looks good. But should the source pages really use syntax highlighting? > I think if somebody is interested in the source then they should get > the real source without any highlighting. If you decide to keep the > syntax highlighting then the highlighting of multiline ReST strings > should be fixed. For example see the source for splitext(). Yeah. Georg said the same yesterday. I'll revert that change so that it displays the plain sources as text/plain in the online version too. Regards, Armin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4