A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2007-May/073407.html below:

[Python-Dev] The docs, reloaded

[Python-Dev] The docs, reloaded [Python-Dev] The docs, reloadedDennis Benzinger Dennis.Benzinger at gmx.net
Wed May 23 11:58:34 CEST 2007
Am Wed, 23 May 2007 08:30:17 +0200
schrieb Georg Brandl <g.brandl at gmx.net>:

> [...]
> Also, try
> 
> http://pydoc.gbrandl.de:3000/os.path.exists
> [...]

Looks good. But should the source pages really use syntax highlighting?
I think if somebody is interested in the source then they should get
the real source without any highlighting. If you decide to keep the
syntax highlighting then the highlighting of multiline ReST strings
should be fixed. For example see the source for splitext().

Thanks for the work,
Dennis Benzinger
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4