Steve Holden schrieb: > Titus Brown wrote: >> On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 11:45:04AM -0500, skip at pobox.com wrote: >> -> >> -> >> You at least take away a common excuse for lack of contributions. >> -> >> True whiners will just come up with new ones (e.g., "the >> -> >> documentation isn't available in Sanskrit yet" or "the dog ate my >> -> >> changes before I could type them into the computer"). ;-) >> -> >> -> Steve> But doesn't *everyone* now know that documentation contributions >> -> Steve> don't have to be marked up? It's certainly been said >> -> Steve> enough. >> -> >> -> Sure, but that doesn't stop the true whiners. ;-) >> >> Nothing stops the true whiners ;). >> >> I think new and exciting ways of viewing, searching, annotating, linking >> to/from, and indexing the docs are more important than new formats for >> (not) writing the docs. >> >> For example, this rocks! :: >> >> http://pydoc.gbrandl.de/search.html?q=os.path&area=default >> > It would be more impressive if the search string returned hits ... This is a JavaScript based search, which will only be (optionally) integrated in the offline version. The online version will get a more sophisticated search. We've just finished to implement the quick dispatcher in the repository. A request to http://docs.python.org/os.path would then redirect to the appropriate module page, as well as http://docs.python.org/?q=os.path Something like http://docs.python.org/?q=os.paht (note the misspelling) would lead to a page with close matching results, os.path being the first of them. (The web app is based on wsgiref, with a few wrappers around it...) cheers, Georg
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4