Hoi, Stephen J. Turnbull <stephen <at> xemacs.org> writes: > > IMO that pair of examples shows clearly that, in this application, > reST is not an improvement over LaTeX in terms of readability/ > writability of source. It's probably not worse, although I can't help > muttering "EIBTI". In particular I find the "``'...'``" construct > horribly unreadable because it makes it hard to find the Python syntax > in all the reST. Well. That was a bad example. But if you look at the converted sources and open the source file you can see that rst is a lot cleaner that latex for this type of documentation. Regards, Armin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4