Armin Ronacher schrieb: > Hoi, > > Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fdrake <at> acm.org> writes: > >> >> On Monday 21 May 2007, A.M. Kuchling wrote: >> > Disadvantages: >> > >> > * reST markup isn't much simpler than LaTeX. >> >> * reST doesn't support nested markup, which is used in the current >> documentation. > > For a lightweight markup language that is human readable (which rst certainly > is) the syntax is surprisingly powerful. You can nest any block tag and I'm not > sure how often you have to nest roles and stuff like that. The goal of the new > docs is a less complex syntax and currently nothing beats reStructuredText in > terms of readability and possibilities. Also, I believe there are efforts within docutils to make a limited amount of nested inline markup possible. Lea will probably be able to provide details. cheers, Georg
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4