On Mon, May 21, 2007, Jon Ribbens wrote: > > One comment I have, I don't know if it's relevant - it perhaps depends > on whether the "Global Module Index" is auto-generated or not. This is > the page I visit the most out of all the Python documentation, and > it's far too large and unwieldy. IMHO it would be much better if only > the top-level modules were shown here - having the single package > 'distutils', for example, take up nearly 50 entries in the list is > almost certainly hindering a lot more people than it helps. It would > perhaps be better if such packages show up as one entry, which shows > the sub-modules when clicked on. That's a good point in general, but I think we want to manually label some submodules as having entries in the global module index (notably os.path). -- Aahz (aahz at pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/ "Look, it's your affair if you want to play with five people, but don't go calling it doubles." --John Cleese anticipates Usenet
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4