A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2007-May/073317.html below:

[Python-Dev] The docs, reloaded

[Python-Dev] The docs, reloadedA.M. Kuchling amk at amk.ca
Mon May 21 23:04:10 CEST 2007
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 09:23:47AM -0400, Fred L. Drake, Jr. wrote:
> I'll be happy to pull the existing tools out into a separate distribution if 
> we move to something else for Python.  There are too many users of the 
> existing tools to abandon.

That seems like a straightforward task.  

The big stumbling block in switching away from LaTeX has always been
the effort of making a good conversion; if Georg's work does 80% of
the job, we should definitely take advantage of the opportunity and 
try to switch.

Advantages of reST:

* The required tool chain shrinks (at least if you're not making printed
  output, which will probably still go through LaTeX).
* Tool chain is now more easily scriptable, and it'll be easier to 
  make use of the docs from Python code.
* We can produce XML output through the rst2xml script.

Disadvantages:

* reST markup isn't much simpler than LaTeX.

--amk
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4