RetroSearch Browse

Mon May 21 21:29:41 CEST 2007 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2007-May/073311.html

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On May 21, 2007, at 12:28 AM, Martin v. Löwis wrote:

> I disagree. The documentation infrastructure of Python should only
> consider the needs of Python itself. If other people can use that
> infrastructure for other purposes, fine - if they find that it does
> not meet their needs, they have to look elsewhere.

I would take a fairly broad view of the term "for Python" though.   
Specifically, third party modules and applications written for and in  
Python should be explicitly supported.  I think we'd like to see one  
(preferred) documentation tool chain for core Python, plus the vast  
number of third party modules and apps.  I don't see any reason why  
Georg's reST-based system couldn't provide that (80/20 rule perhaps?).

I'd point to for example the howto templates, which can be easily  
used for third party applications.  Mailman uses howtos for example.

BTW, Georg excellent work.  I'm a big latex fan and long-time user,  
but I do think that using reST will open the door to a lot more  
contributions.

- -Barry

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin)

iQCVAwUBRlHzJXEjvBPtnXfVAQLNXQP/QUuZ2gc/DpoidI9jYt7mr66Z+JYHsslv
fe4CvFSjd9OxwA3eOynd9dSOSkO6QHQPDVomW8axEkJJSHWNosnr9gmDZcC75nAD
JTt4rGImqwkcVIAzE91pZ3fmce/ltp9p1Ru3B1dDRmXbNgHxZ9njaz60MPFszC/H
19jSBo5sqSU=
=hlhi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2007-May/073311.html below:

[Python-Dev] The docs, reloaded