Neal Becker wrote: > Sounds very interesting. I just have one concern/question. I hope that > while moving away from latex, we are not precluding the ability to write > math as part of the documentation. What would be my choices for add math > to the documentation? Hopefully using latex, since there really isn't > AFAIK any other competitor for this. > Where in the current documentation is there any math notation /at all/? In all my reading of it, I have not run across anything that appeared like it was being used. Besides that question, is the full power of LaTeX math notation really necessary here? I somehow doubt anything more than simple expressions of runtime performance and container behaviors are appropriate for any documentation we have. -Scott -- Scott Dial scott at scottdial.com scodial at cs.indiana.edu
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4