On Sat, 19 May 2007, Georg Brandl wrote: > For the impatient: the result can be seen at <http://pydoc.gbrandl.de>. This is extremely impressive. Thank you for this work! If all the documentation is generated from a base format that is closer to text (reST instead of LaTeX), that will make it easier for volunteers to read diffs, make edits, and contribute patches. I agree that interactivity (online commenting and editing) will be a huge advantage. I could imagine this heading in a Wiki-like direction -- where a particular version is tagged as the official revision shipped with a particular Python release, but everyone can make edits online to yield new versions, eventually yielding the revision that will be released with the next Python release. -- ?!ng
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4