Terry Reedy writes: > Why not simply embargo any post with an off-site link? Tho there might > have been some, I can't remember a single example of such at SF. Fine by me; if it doesn't happen often, then embargoing them would be fine. My occasional experience with distro reporting processes shows that they happen a fair amount there (often as a reference to an upstream or downstream bug report). The major ones can probably be special-cased easily as needed. > I don't get [the short preview idea], but it sounds like more work > than simple embargo. It would be. It is a use-case that according to your explanation doesn't apply to Python's tracker, so a YAGNI until proved otherwise. > I think html attachments should also be embargoed (I believe this is what I > saw a couple of months ago.) And perhaps the account uploading an html > file. Sounds OK to me, except that there are some modules that handle HTML (and XML? can that be practically distinguished from HTML?), and I would suppose people would want upload examples and test cases.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4