Terry Reedy wrote: > "Raymond Hettinger" <python at rcn.com> wrote in message > | While I question the sanity of the spec writers in this case, I do trust > that > | overall, they have provided an extremely well thought-out spec, have gone > | through extensive discussion/feedback cycles, and have provided a > thorough > | test-suite. It is as good as it gets. > > I had the same opinion until I saw the logic stuff. The only rationale I can think of for such a thing is that maybe they're trying to accommodate the possibility of a machine built entirely around a hardware implementation of the spec, that doesn't have any other way of doing bitwise logical operations. If that's the case, then Python clearly has no need for it. -- Greg
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4