A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2007-May/072952.html below:

[Python-Dev] Implicit String Concatenation and Octal Literals Was: PEP 30XZ: Simplified Parsing

[Python-Dev] Implicit String Concatenation and Octal Literals Was: PEP 30XZ: Simplified Parsing [Python-Dev] Implicit String Concatenation and Octal Literals Was: PEP 30XZ: Simplified ParsingJon Ribbens jon+python-dev at unequivocal.co.uk
Thu May 3 12:49:05 CEST 2007
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 10:23:39PM -0700, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
> Another way to look at it is to ask whether we would consider 
> adding implicit string concatenation if we didn't already have it.
> I think there would be a chorus of emails against it

Personally, I would have been irritated if it wasn't there. I'm used
to it from other languages, and it would seem like a gratuitous
incompatability if it wasn't supported.

I'm definitely against this proposal in its entirety.
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4