Please stop arguing about an opinionated piece of anti-super PR. On 5/2/07, Giovanni Bajo <rasky at develer.com> wrote: > On 02/05/2007 12.00, Christian Tanzer wrote: > > >>> Nearly always wrong? You must be kidding. There are tons of reasons to > >>> call your super method with modified arguments. E.g. clipping, > >>> transforming, ... > > >> Really? > >> http://fuhm.net/super-harmful/ > > > > Hmmm. > > > > I've just counted more than 1600 usages of `super` in my > > sandbox. And all my tests pass. > > And you don't follow any of the guidelines reported in that article? And you > never met any of those problems? I find it hard to believe. > > The fact that your code *works* is of little importance, since the article is > more about maintenance of existing code using super (and the suggestions he > proposes are specifically for making code using super less fragile to > refactorings). > -- > Giovanni Bajo > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org > -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4