On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 04:42:09PM +0100, Michael Foord wrote: > Implicit string concatenation is massively useful for creating long > strings in a readable way though: This PEP doesn't seem very well-argued: "It's a common mistake to leave off a comma, and then scons complains that it can't find 'foo.cbar.c'." Yes, and then you say "oh, right!" and add the missing comma; problem fixed! The whole cycle takes about a minute. Is this really an issue worth fixing? --amk
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4