On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 16:38:45 -0700, Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote: >On 3/28/07, Facundo Batista <facundo at taniquetil.com.ar> wrote: >> There's this bug (#451607) about the needing of tests for socket SSL... >> >> Last interesting update in the tracker is five years ago, and since a >> lot of work has been done in test_socket_ssl.py (Brett, Neal, Tim, >> George Brandl). >> >> Do you think is useful to leave this bug opened? > >Having a bug left open because a module needs more test is not really >needed. It's rather obvious when a module needs more tests. =) > >I say close it. I just wish we had a more reliable web site to >connect to for SSL tests. How about something even better? Take a look at "openssl s_server". This is still a pretty terrible way to test the SSL functionality, but it's loads better than connecting to a site on the public internet. Jean-Paul
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4