RetroSearch Browse

Wed Mar 21 21:50:14 CET 2007 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2007-March/072218.html

I think it was just expedient to group these together when the bool
type was added. I wouldn't lose sleep over it either way.

On 3/21/07, Collin Winter <collinw at gmail.com> wrote:
> Is there any reason for test_bool to contain assertions like these?
>
> self.assertIs({}.has_key(1), False)
> self.assertIs({1:1}.has_key(1), True)
>
> A significant portion of the file is devoted to making sure various
> things return bools (isinstance, operator.*) or handle bools correctly
> (pickle, marshal). Since these don't test the functionality of the
> bool type, is there a reason not to move these tests to more
> appropriate test files (eg, test_pickle) or removing them altogether
> (if they duplicate existing tests)?
>
> I've started on this somewhat, but I thought I'd ask before I spent
> too much time on it.
>
> Collin Winter
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org
>

-- 
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2007-March/072218.html below:

[Python-Dev] Contents of test_bool