RetroSearch Browse

Wed Mar 21 19:44:59 CET 2007 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2007-March/072211.html

Guido van Rossum wrote:

> This is why I proposed to *get rid of* the distinction between
> timeout=None and timeout not specified. Let an unspecified timeout
> default to None, and if timeout is None, skip the settimeout() call.

+1

I'll abuse of your dictatorship, and let's see if we can finally
specify what I'd do:

- Just put a timeout default to None. If None, skip settimeout() call.

- Copy the exceptions behaviour that we have actually in the higher
  level libraries: maybe it's not the best, but we're sure we aren't
  breaking anything.

- As you said in other thread when voting (a,b,c), let's make the
  function public (but with the more specific name: create_connection).

If it's ok, I'll prepare one more update to the patch.

Regards,

-- 
.   Facundo
.
Blog: http://www.taniquetil.com.ar/plog/
PyAr: http://www.python.org/ar/

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2007-March/072211.html below:

Adding timeout to socket.pyand httplib.py.