Anthony> On Thursday 15 March 2007 08:54, Martin v. Löwis wrote: >> The bug fix may also break existing applications. Hence it cannot go >> into 2.5.1 but has to wait for 2.6. Anthony> Steering clear of the rest of the discussion, I'd just like to Anthony> give a hearty "+1" for this not going into 2.5.x in any way Anthony> shape or form. Given that the topic seems so contentious, maybe it should wait until 3.x. Skip
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4