> > Personally, I can't apply it as-is right now, since a) I would have to > check that the test case conditionalization works fine, and b) I would > have to come up with a patch for the Windows build process. Sorry, I couldn't understand the second point. Why would you have to patch the Windows build process? > If you want to prioritize it over the other 300 patches, I can offer > you a fast-track procedure if you in turn review 5 other patches. Well, it's not really my place to ask that this patch is prioritised above others, since as I said if I'm asking for its inclusion it is in order to benefit other Python users who may easily hit the same problem. As far as I'm concerned personally, I have no problem at all applying the patch manually. Anyway, I'm intrigued about this "review 5 other patches" procedure you suggest. What exactly would be involved in such a review? Please note that I hadn't touched CPython code before I wrote my patch and I haven't been following CPython development closely. Regards, Miguel -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20070312/4d0de61a/attachment.htm
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4