On 3/11/07, Christian Heimes <lists at cheimes.de> wrote:
> Jon Ribbens schrieb:
> > I see you snipped without response my request to back up your claim
> > that "assuming that a date() is a datetime() with a time of midnight
> > will clearly break that logic".
>
> I've another idea. Date and datetime objects are compared by date. The
> date object for a given date is always smaller than the datetime for the
> same day - even for midnight.
I really don't understand what the problem is with having a date()
behave like a proper temporal interval. The only person complaining
about that interpretation acknowledged that for his purposes, it would
be better than the status quo. And I have yet to see a use case where
being consistent with temporal interval logic is a problem.
STeVe
--
I'm not *in*-sane. Indeed, I am so far *out* of sane that you appear a
tiny blip on the distant coast of sanity.
--- Bucky Katt, Get Fuzzy
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4