On 3/10/07, A.M. Kuchling <amk at amk.ca> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 10:10:48PM -0800, Neal Norwitz wrote: > > We should probably be a lot more aggressive about closing bugs and > > patches without response. Unfortunately many fall into this category. > > This question comes up every so often, and after much discussion I > think python-dev always converges on leaving bugs open in case some > future person finds the information useful. I was thinking about patches only in this case, not bugs. > I hope that the Roundup tracker will let us tag such bugs with a > 'waiting-for-reporter' tag, and we can then exclude such bugs when > looking for ones to fix. Georg added a comment/feature request for this. Actually, he requested a close on inactivity after some duration if we set a keyword or something like that. Since we are in control of the tracker, we can make it happen if someone cares enough. n
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4