""Martin v. Löwis"" <martin at v.loewis.de> wrote in message news:45EE8F8E.3070409 at v.loewis.de... >You may ask yourself why this specific patch was unreviewed for >so long. My own explanation is that it is a highly complicated >algorithm (as any kind of cryptographical algorithm), so nobody >felt qualified to review it. I'm pretty sure it was *looked at* >often (contrary to your remark in [1]), but none of the people >reading it were qualified to comment. I have looked at nunerous patches without commenting because I could not or did not do a full review. You and Neal have convinced me that I have been too shy and that even little comments like 'the doc revision looks good' might help. tjr
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4