Giovanni Bajo schrieb: > On 06/03/2007 10.52, Martin v. Löwis wrote: > >> I can't see that the barrier at contributing is high. > > I think this says it all. It now appears obvious to me that people > inside the "mafia" don't even realize there is one. Thus, it looks like > we are all wasting time in this thread, since they think there is > nothing to be changed. I can feel your pain that your (only) patch was unreviewed for three years. If it makes you happy to blame somebody feel free to, but I feel it is unfair to blame the single person that eventually *did* review and commit your patch. You may ask yourself why this specific patch was unreviewed for so long. My own explanation is that it is a highly complicated algorithm (as any kind of cryptographical algorithm), so nobody felt qualified to review it. I'm pretty sure it was *looked at* often (contrary to your remark in [1]), but none of the people reading it were qualified to comment. So if you want to work on encryption still, please go ahead. Regards, Martin [1] http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2004-November/293510.html
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4