On Tuesday 06 March 2007 20:24, Martin v. Löwis wrote: > It might be that individuals get designated maintainers: Guido > maintains list and tuple, Tim maintaines dict, Raymond maintains > set, I maintain configure.in. However, I doubt that would work in > practice. That approach would simply give us many many single points of failure. For instance, you're maintaining a particular module but at the time an important bug/patch comes up, you're off on holidays, or busy, or the like. Sure, you could say "this person is primary, and this person is backup" but hell, there's a lot of different components that make up Python. That would be a maintenance and management nightmare. -- Anthony Baxter <anthony at interlink.com.au> It's never too late to have a happy childhood.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4