On 3/6/07, Hans Meine <meine at informatik.uni-hamburg.de> wrote: > The current behavior is clearly a bug, since a leading dot does not start an > extension, but marks a file as "hidden". The latter is on UNIX, and while > this is different on Windows, I cannot imagine that anyone would > a) have dotfiles under that OS, or even then > b) rely on the current behavior that their full filename counts as > "extension". FWIW, all of the "standard" Windows functions from the Microsoft CRT (_splitpath) to the Shell API (PathRemoveExtension) to the CLR (System.IO.Path.*) believe that ".cshrc" is the extension of the filename ".cshrc". I'm not sure if that's an argument for or against the patch, though. -- Tim Lesher <tlesher at gmail.com>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4