On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 02:44:52PM +0100, Hans Meine wrote: > a leading dot does not start an > extension, but marks a file as "hidden". The latter is on UNIX, and while On Unix - I mean in the OS itself - there are no such things as "roots", "extensions" and "hidden files". All these are only conventions in the user programs. The current behaviour is not a bug in a strict sense, but it is inconvenient and hence should be changed. > this is different on Windows, I cannot imagine that anyone would > a) have dotfiles under that OS I have. (-: I often copy files from an ext3 partition to a FAT partition on my dual-booting desktop. Oleg. -- Oleg Broytmann http://phd.pp.ru/ phd at phd.pp.ru Programmers don't die, they just GOSUB without RETURN.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4