Paul Moore schrieb: >> Scott Dial schrieb: >>> While I understand that this tit-for-tat mechanism is meant to ensure >>> participation, I believe in reality it doesn't, as the 400-some >>> outstanding patches you referenced elswhere indicate. I can personally >>> attest to having a patch that is over a year old with no "core >>> developer" having any interest at all with the subject matter. > > Here's a random offer - let me know the patch number for your patch, > and I'll review it. Surprisingly (and I hope Scott can clarify that), I can't find anything. Assuming Scott's SF account is "geekmug", I don't see any open patches (1574068 was closed within 20 days by amk, last October). Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4