RetroSearch Browse

Tue Mar 6 00:54:04 CET 2007 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2007-March/071514.html

On Mon, Mar 05, 2007, Terry Reedy wrote:
>
> Tracker item review is an obvious bottleneck in Python development.
> In particular, reviewing patches appears not to be nearly as
> self-motivating as writing them, and other activities.  So I think the
> PSF should pay one or more people to do so.  Possibly set up a patch
> review fund and solicit donations.  And, donators should get priority
> attention to their submissions.  For commercial developers, this would
> probably be cheaper, given the value of their time, than reviewing
> five other submissions.

There also seems to be a sense that we're waiting to get off SourceForge
and using our own tracker.
-- 
Aahz (aahz at pythoncraft.com)           <*>         http://www.pythoncraft.com/

"I disrespectfully agree."  --SJM

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2007-March/071514.html below:

[Python-Dev] Encouraging developers