A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2007-June/073740.html below:

[Python-Dev] object capability; func_closure; __subclasses__

[Python-Dev] object capability; func_closure; __subclasses__ [Python-Dev] object capability; func_closure; __subclasses__Robert Brewer fumanchu at amor.org
Thu Jun 28 19:20:31 CEST 2007 
tav wrote:
> But, all I am asking for is to not expose func_closure (and perhaps
> some of the other func_*) as members of FunctionType -- isn't it
> possible to add functionality to the ``new`` module which would allow
> one to read/write func_closure?

Would func_closure then also be removed from the FunctionType
constructor arg list? If so, would I be expected to create a function
object and then use the "new" module to supply its func_closure?


Robert Brewer
System Architect
Amor Ministries
fumanchu at amor.org
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4