Raymond Hettinger wrote: > In the case of iter(collection), I prefer the current wording because the target object need not support __iter__, it is sufficient > to supply a sequential __getitem__ method. Seems to me that should be included in the definition of an iterable -- i.e. anything for which iter() works is an iterable. -- Greg
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4