A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2007-July/073809.html below:

[Python-Dev] Should r53624 be applied to release branches?

[Python-Dev] Should r53624 be applied to release branches? [Python-Dev] Should r53624 be applied to release branches?skip at pobox.com skip at pobox.com
Tue Jul 10 13:57:37 CEST 2007
    Aaron> We recently had a production failure caused by the issue fixed in
    Aaron> r53624 on the trunk [1].  I see that this patch has also been
    Aaron> applied to py3k-struni.  Should this patch be merged to the
    Aaron> release branches?  In the meantime we will have to patch
    Aaron> subprocess.py ourselves.

In theory, I'm in favor of backporting, but how far back do you need/want to
apply it?  There will clearly be more 2.5 releases.  I don't think any more
2.4 releases are planned.

Skip
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4