On Sunday 21 January 2007 05:17, Josiah Carlson wrote: > Neal Becker <ndbecker2 at gmail.com> wrote: > [snip] > > > It's not a question, it's a critique. I believe this is a > > misfeature since it's so easy to make this mistake. > > And it is going away with Py3k. Making it go away for Python 2.6 > would either allow for two syntaxes to do the same thing, or > would require everyone to change their except clauses. Neither > is very desireable (especially if writing code for 2.6 makes it > not work for 2.5). Note that we do plan to add "except a as b" to 2.6 - we're just not ripping out the old way of doing it. Anthony -- Anthony Baxter <anthony at interlink.com.au> It's never too late to have a happy childhood.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4