A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2007-January/070645.html below:

[Python-Dev] The bytes type

[Python-Dev] The bytes type [Python-Dev] The bytes typeJames Y Knight foom at fuhm.net
Tue Jan 16 10:25:22 CET 2007
On Jan 12, 2007, at 7:26 PM, Ron Adam wrote:
> For me, the thing that will make porting 2.x to 3.x code easy is to  
> make python
> 3.0 as clean and organized as you can with excellent  
> documentation.  Half-way
> and duel-way approaches will probably not help me as much as this.
>
> Most of the difficulty I have in converting programs is in finding the
> information I need.  The actual editing is not a problem.

Yes, the actual editing is not a problem, as long as you only need to  
do it once. The problem is when you have a module/program/whatever  
that you need to provide a release of for 2.5 and would also like to  
provide a release of for 3.0. Then, the editing becomes a problem,  
because you have to do it again for every change you make.

James
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4