SVN rev 52305 resolved Bug #1545497: when given an explicit base, int() did ignore NULs embedded in the string to convert. However, the same fix wasn't applied for long(). n On 1/13/07, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote: > What's wrong with this session? :-) > > Python 2.6a0 (trunk:53416, Jan 13 2007, 15:24:17) > [GCC 4.0.1 (Apple Computer, Inc. build 5363)] on darwin > Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. > >>> int('123\0') > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module> > ValueError: null byte in argument for int() > >>> int('123\0', 10) > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module> > ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 10: '123\x00' > >>> long('123\0') > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module> > ValueError: null byte in argument for long() > >>> long('123\0', 10) > 123L > >>> > > -- > --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/) > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/nnorwitz%40gmail.com >
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4