A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2007-January/070619.html below:

[Python-Dev] [Python-3000] Warning for 2.6 and greater

[Python-Dev] [Python-3000] Warning for 2.6 and greater [Python-Dev] [Python-3000] Warning for 2.6 and greaterMichael Hudson mwh at python.net
Sat Jan 13 14:56:18 CET 2007
glyph at divmod.com writes:

> On 10:12 am, mwh at python.net wrote:
>
>>For practical reasons (we have enough work to be getting on with) PyPy
>>is more-or-less ignoring Python 2.5 at the moment.  After funding and
>>so on, when there's less pressure, maybe it will seem worth it.  Not
>>soon though.
>
> I think I know what you mean from previous conversations, but the
> context of the question makes the answer ambiguous.  Are you
> ignoring 2.5 in favor of 2.4, or 3.0?

In favour of 2.4 -- the one that exists now :) 

Cheers,
mwh

-- 
  > It might get my attention if you'd spin around in your chair,
  > spoke in tongues, and puked jets of green goblin goo.
  I can arrange for this.  ;-)            -- Barry Warsaw & Fred Drake
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4