glyph at divmod.com writes: > On 10:12 am, mwh at python.net wrote: > >>For practical reasons (we have enough work to be getting on with) PyPy >>is more-or-less ignoring Python 2.5 at the moment. After funding and >>so on, when there's less pressure, maybe it will seem worth it. Not >>soon though. > > I think I know what you mean from previous conversations, but the > context of the question makes the answer ambiguous. Are you > ignoring 2.5 in favor of 2.4, or 3.0? In favour of 2.4 -- the one that exists now :) Cheers, mwh -- > It might get my attention if you'd spin around in your chair, > spoke in tongues, and puked jets of green goblin goo. I can arrange for this. ;-) -- Barry Warsaw & Fred Drake
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4