RetroSearch Browse

Fri Jan 12 22:49:12 CET 2007 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2007-January/070606.html

Terry Reedy wrote:
> "A.M. Kuchling" <amk at amk.ca> wrote in message 
> news:20070112182248.GA15187 at localhost.localdomain...
> | [*] Anyone else keep wanting to write "byte type"?
>
> All the other builtin types I can think of are singular.  So I think byte 
> should be also. 
>
>   
The string holds 'a string' (singular), the bytes datatype will hold 
'bytes' plural. Bytes is more accurate and I would stumble over byte.

Michael Foord

>
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/fuzzyman%40voidspace.org.uk
>
>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2007-January/070606.html below:

[Python-Dev] The bytes type