glyph> "I think we should draw a line in the sand and resolve not to glyph> compatibility-up Py2.6. The whole Py3.0 project is about glyph> eliminating useful libraries and being free of the bonds of glyph> working software. Adding non-essential forward-compatibility to glyph> Py2.6 goes against that philosophy." I think you meant "useless", right? I'm not aware of any proposals to eliminate the os, re or csv modules. ;-) Skip
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4