On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 10:49:13AM -0800, Raymond Hettinger wrote: > I think we should draw a line in the sand and resolve not to garbage-up > Py2.6. > The whole Py3.0 project is about eliminating cruft and being free of the > bonds of backwards compatibility. Adding non-essential cruft to Py2.6 > goes against that philosophy. We could add the bytes type to Jython only and leave it out of the 2.x series. That still requires nailing down the semantics of 'bytes'. --amk
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4