A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2007-January/070586.html below:

[Python-Dev] The bytes type (was Re: Warning for 2.6 and greater)

[Python-Dev] The bytes type (was Re: Warning for 2.6 and greater) [Python-Dev] The bytes type (was Re: Warning for 2.6 and greater)A.M. Kuchling amk at amk.ca
Fri Jan 12 17:59:32 CET 2007
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 10:14:57AM -0500, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> I think there will be at least three areas that will make porting a  
> challenge:
   ...
> - - Unicode/str/bytes incompatibilities

Something I've been meaning to bring up... do we know what shape the
Unicode/str/bytes resolution will take?  It would be nice to know so
that similar changes can be made to Jython.  For example, str in
Jython is a Unicode type, but things like the MD5 module should really
only be dealing with 8-bit strings.

Is PEP 358 still the current thinking on the bytes type?  If yes,
should we set about implementing it for Jython and Python 2.6?

--amk

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4