A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2007-January/070577.html below:

[Python-Dev] [Python-3000] Warning for 2.6 and greater

[Python-Dev] [Python-3000] Warning for 2.6 and greater [Python-Dev] [Python-3000] Warning for 2.6 and greaterglyph at divmod.com glyph at divmod.com
Fri Jan 12 11:56:21 CET 2007
On 10:12 am, mwh at python.net wrote:

>For practical reasons (we have enough work to be getting on with) PyPy
>is more-or-less ignoring Python 2.5 at the moment.  After funding and
>so on, when there's less pressure, maybe it will seem worth it.  Not
>soon though.

I think I know what you mean from previous conversations, but the context of the question makes the answer ambiguous.  Are you ignoring 2.5 in favor of 2.4, or 3.0?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20070112/a40df02b/attachment.htm 
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4