Ron Adam wrote: > Improving pydoc has been suggested before by me and others. I've been working > on a version that is probably 80% done and would like to get feed back at this > point to determine if I'm approaching this in the best way. Just asking--are you going in a PEP-287-ly way as you work? If not, would your work make PEP 287 easier to implement? For those of us without eidetic memories, PEP 287 is "use reStructuredText for docstrings": http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0287/ Cheers, /larry/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20070104/dd8b50f0/attachment.html
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4