Nick Coghlan schrieb: >> I'd like to repeat Guido's question: Why does this still need to >> support the tuple interface (i.e. indexed access)? > > So that it remains interoperable with existing libraries that expect a > tuple? Otherwise you'd be casting (and copying) every time you needed to > pass it to something that used indexed access. Can you give a few example, for libraries where this isn't already done? Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4