RetroSearch Browse

Wed Feb 14 21:37:00 CET 2007 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2007-February/071125.html

On 02:22 pm, aahz at pythoncraft.com wrote:
>On Wed, Feb 14, 2007, glyph at divmod.com wrote:
>>
>> As I said, I don't have time to write the PEPs myself, but I might fix
>> some specific bugs if there were a clear set of issues preventing this
>> from moving forward.  Better integration with the standard library
>> would definitely be a big win for both Twisted and Python.
>
>Here's where I'm coming from:
>
>My first experience with Twisted was excellent: I needed a web server in
>fifteen minutes to do my PyCon presentation, and it Just Worked.
>
>My second experience with Twisted?  Well, I didn't really have one.

Thanks for the feedback, Aahz... I'm a little confused, though.  Is this just a personal anecdote, or were you trying to make a larger point about Twisted's suitability for the stdlib?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20070214/96f20e8c/attachment.htm

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2007-February/071125.html below:

[Python-Dev] Twisted Isn't Specific (was Re: Trial balloon: microthreads library in stdlib)