RetroSearch Browse

Wed Feb 14 16:30:19 CET 2007 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2007-February/071110.html

The same way += et al. are in-place: it would ask 'x' to modify itself, if
it can. If not, no harm done. (It would be called as 'x = ipow(x, n, 10)' of
course, just like 'x += n' is really 'x = x.__iadd__(n)')

On 2/10/07, "Martin v. Löwis" <martin at v.loewis.de> wrote:
>
> Greg Ewing schrieb:
> >> What could the syntax for that be?
> >
> > It wouldn't be a syntax, just a function, e.g.
> >
> >    ipow(x, n, 10)
>
> In what way would that be inplace? A function cannot
> rebind the variables it gets as parameters.
>
> Regards,
> Martin
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe:
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/thomas%40python.org
>

-- 
Thomas Wouters <thomas at python.org>

Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me
spread!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20070214/ee026245/attachment.html 

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2007-February/071110.html below:

[Python-Dev] Why is nb_inplace_power ternary?