On Wed, Feb 14, 2007, glyph at divmod.com wrote: > > As I said, I don't have time to write the PEPs myself, but I might fix > some specific bugs if there were a clear set of issues preventing this > from moving forward. Better integration with the standard library > would definitely be a big win for both Twisted and Python. Here's where I'm coming from: My first experience with Twisted was excellent: I needed a web server in fifteen minutes to do my PyCon presentation, and it Just Worked. My second experience with Twisted? Well, I didn't really have one. My first experience was Twisted 1.1, and when I tried installing 2.0 on my Mac (about 1.5 years ago), it just didn't work. Combined with the difficulty of using the documentation and the fact that I was in a hurry, I rejected the Twisted solution. (My company needed an FTP server that did a callback every time a file got uploaded -- something that I expect would be very simple for Twisted.) -- Aahz (aahz at pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/ "I disrespectfully agree." --SJM
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4